د "نوی استعمار" د بڼو تر مېنځ توپير

 

 

نوی استعمار له معیاري نړیوال توب او پراختیايي مرستو څخه توپیر لري، ځکه په معمول ډول نوی استعمار د اړوندتیا د اړیکې، تابع توب او یا تر نوي استعمار لاندې ملت ته د مالي ژمنتیا د رامنځته کېدو لامل ګرځي. دغه چاره کېدای شي د سیاسي کنټرول د نامتناسبې کچې یا د پورونو د مارپیچي ژمنتیا لامل وګرځي چې له عملي پلوه د سنتي استعمار له اړیکې تقلید کوي.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Prashad|first=Vijay|title=The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World|publisher=The New Press|year=2007|location=New York|pages=233|quote="The IMF urged the indebted nations to submit themselves to complete integration in the world capitalist system, and not try to create either autarkic modes of economic protection or even reforms to privilege domestic development. Rather than deal with the short-term balance-of-payments crisis for what it was, the IMF in the 1970 used the financial crisis as the means to demand deep shifts in the political and economic arrangements devised by the Third World. In other words, the IMF went after every policy initiated by its fellow international agency, UNCTAD."}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Prashad|first=Vijay|title=The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World|publisher=The New Press|year=2007|location=New York|pages=231|quote="The nations of sub-Saharan Africa spent four times more on debt service, on interest payments, than on health care. For most of the indebted states, between one-third and one-fifth of their gross national product was squandered in this debt-service tribute. The debt crisis had winners: the financial interests in the G-7."}}</ref>